Legal Opinion

Daniel N. Rios v. Mark Henry, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1993No. 93-55061Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

9 F.3d 1553

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Daniel N. RIOS, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Mark HENRY, Warden, et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-55061.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 1, 1993.*

Decided Nov. 9, 1993.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Frank v. Hernandez v. Denny Johnston Tom Ahearn Jim Rogers John McCain Chuck Houser Al Scamahorn Dan Snyder William Callahan Bob BennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Salvatore Joseph Marino v. Dan Vasquez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Marcus T. Baumann v. Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API