Legal Opinion

Kunz v. Ragsdale

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1917No. 5912PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Karnes County; F. G. Chambliss, Judge. Suit by Victoria Kunz and others against J. W. Ragsdale and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants, Victoria Kunz, joined by her husband, Frank Kunz, Agnes Malik, Genovefa Hahn, joined by her husband, Raymond Hahn, Frantiska Malik, and Joseph Malik, the last-named two, minors, being represented by Agnes Malik, as next friend, sued J. W. Ragsdale, D. A. Paulus, Mary Malik, and the American Surety Company of New York to recover $1,030.47, alleged to be the proportionate part belonging to plaintiffs of certain sums loaned by A. Malik, the first guardian of plaintiffs which loans were not collected but renewed by Mary Malik, their second guardian, who was appointed after the death…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gaines Et Ux. v. ChewSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  2. Skipwith v. HurtTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Love v. KeowneTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Moore v. Waco Building Assn.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. A. G. Graves & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harris v. WillsonTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Nueces County v. GussettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Thomas v. Basden & CarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. National Surety Co. v. Atascosa Ice, Water & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Shaw v. DalstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API