Legal Opinion
Magnetic Data, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 21, 1988No. C7-88-823PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This is an appeal from summary judgment declaring the appellant insurance company responsible for indemnifying and defending its insured against claims by the insured’s customer. We affirm.
FACTS
The respondent Magnetic Data Inc. (MDI) is a computer company whose principal business is inspecting and repairing computer disk cartridges. A computer disk cartridge comprises a protective plastic molding and a disk platter upon which data can be magnetically encoded and stored. A disk cartridge can be inspected for defects by visual inspection, gauge measurement, or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. BartlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Terrace Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- PFZ Properties, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Computer Corner, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Magnetic Data, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Peoples Telephone Co., Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1997