Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided November 6, 1996No. Civil Action 3-.95CV-707-HPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HEYBURN, District Judge.

The Court now considers two separate motions by each Defendant, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and Ford Motor Company. First, they have moved pursuant to F.R.C.P. 1404(a) for a change of venue to the Southern District of Indiana. Second, they have moved for summary judgment, relying on Indiana’s statute of repose, Ind.Code Ann. § 33-1-1.5-5. 1 Both Plaintiff and Defendants have argued their positions artfully and completely.

As a preliminary matter one must remember that venue and choice of law questions, while they quite frequently rely on common…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Foster v. LeggettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  4. Wessling v. ParisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  5. Breeding v. Massachusetts Indemnity & Life Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Picker International, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  2. Custom Products, Inc. v. Fluor Daniel Canada, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
  3. D.C. Micro Development, Inc. v. LangeDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
  4. Jacobson v. SweeneyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  5. Corder v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API