Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fenwick v. Oklahoma State Penitentiary

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1990No. 69691Published

1Dissent

OPALA, Vice Chief Justice,

with whom KAUGER, Justice, joins, dissenting.

Today the court reiterates extant precedent holding work-related psychic trauma unaccompanied by physical injury to be noncompensable. I recede from this pronouncement and join the dissent by Kau-ger, J. For me, there is no textually demonstrable legislative intent to exclude from compensability those accidental injuries that result in mental scarring alone. I write separately to explain why I cannot accede to the court’s exposition of the governing act.1

*64I.

NEITHER PROCEDURAL NOR SUBSTANTIVE NORMS OF THE COMMON LAW HAVE A…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Eddy v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API