Fenwick v. Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
OPALA, Vice Chief Justice,
with whom KAUGER, Justice, joins, dissenting.
Today the court reiterates extant precedent holding work-related psychic trauma unaccompanied by physical injury to be noncompensable. I recede from this pronouncement and join the dissent by Kau-ger, J. For me, there is no textually demonstrable legislative intent to exclude from compensability those accidental injuries that result in mental scarring alone. I write separately to explain why I cannot accede to the court’s exposition of the governing act.1
*64I.
NEITHER PROCEDURAL NOR SUBSTANTIVE NORMS OF THE COMMON LAW HAVE A…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Eddy v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.