Braswell Motor Freight, Inc. v. United States
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
EAST, District Judge.
THE PARTIES AND PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
The Intervening Defendant, Hopper Truck Lines, now O. N. C. Motor Freight System (Hopper), was a motor carrier engaged with its then parent, O. N. C. Motor Freight System, in transporting general commodities under permanent authorities from the Defendant Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) to serve routes in the states of Arizona, California, Oregon, Washington and Nevada.
Hopper sought to extend its permanent authority on a temporary basis from Phoenix eastward to Silver City, New Mexico.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alamo Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1965
- Bell Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1969
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1966
- Estes Express Lines v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
- Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frozen Foods Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
- Rea Express, Inc., Bankrupt, L. Orvis Sowerwine, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Garrett Freightlines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1973
- East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979