Legal Opinion
MACDONALD v. SABANDO
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 12, 2025No. 1:23-cv-23044Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SHANNON MACDONALD, et al., Case No. 23–cv–23044–ESK–EAP Plaintiffs, v. OPINION OTTO F. SABANDO, Defendant. KIEL, U.S.D.J. THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant Otto F. Sabando’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 23.) For the following reasons, the motion will be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND A. Telemedicine in New Jersey Pursuant to N.J. Stat. Ann. § (Section) 45:1–62(b), any healthcare provider who utilizes telemedicine or engages in telehealth must be licensed, certified, or registered to provide such services in New Jersey.
N.J. Stat. Ann. §…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Karen Malleus v. John GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.