Legal Opinion

Bross v. Peyton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The controversy in each of these two cases presents the familiar situation of the amount of timber involved in deeds conveying title to land which contained a reservation of title to certain timber on the land conveyed. In these cases the plaintiffs, Bross in one case and Mr. and Mrs. Zerr in the other, were the grantees in deeds which were executed in 1949. Each deed contained the following reservation:

“ 'hereby selling and conveying to grantees all white cedar timber now growing or situated thereon, excepting and reserving however unto grantors, their heirs and assigns, all fir, pine and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arbogast v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Doherty v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Emerson v. HOOD RIVER COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoglund v. Omak Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. Young v. Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Carlson v. Reservation RanchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Young v. Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API