Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Reservation Ranch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 10, 1993No. CV 89-0623, CA A72403PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment upholding the reservation of a timber interest in a deed. Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s entry of partial summary judgment for defendant Reservation Ranch (defendant) 1 and to the court’s holding following trial that the reservation was valid. We reverse, because the court improperly granted partial summary judgment.

This case concerns 466 acres of timberland in Douglas County. The uncontroverted facts are that in 1945, Don Witcher acquired the subject property. In 1949, the Witchers, as husband and wife, conveyed it to Umpqua Plywood…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Arbogast v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Franke v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Libby Creek Logging, Inc. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hauge v. VanderhaveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Hoglund v. Omak Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  3. Carlson v. Reservation RanchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Biomass One, L.P. v. S-P ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Hauge v. VanderhaveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API