Emerson v. HOOD RIVER COUNTY
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
Hood River County and the other named defendants appeal from a declaratory decree entered in the circuit court for said county which determined that the plaintiff, Emerson, was the owner of certain valuable timber at a date four years earlier when the defendants removed and disposed of it.
The suit was commenced as a suit to quiet title, but, despite an admonition by the trial court that the ease was not a proper case for doing so, the parties, by stipulation, converted the suit into a proceeding for a declaratory judgment. Counsel on appeal, who were not counsel at the trial, suggest that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Miami Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Coquille Mill & Tug Co. v. Robert Dollar Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- County of Lincoln v. FISCHEROregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Rayburn Et Ux. v. Crawford Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Kreinbring v. MathewsOregon Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Franke v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Young v. Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Bross v. PeytonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Pioneer Resources, LLC v. LemargieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Davenport v. GruberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.