Legal Opinion

Emerson v. HOOD RIVER COUNTY

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Hood River County and the other named defendants appeal from a declaratory decree entered in the circuit court for said county which determined that the plaintiff, Emerson, was the owner of certain valuable timber at a date four years earlier when the defendants removed and disposed of it.

The suit was commenced as a suit to quiet title, but, despite an admonition by the trial court that the ease was not a proper case for doing so, the parties, by stipulation, converted the suit into a proceeding for a declaratory judgment. Counsel on appeal, who were not counsel at the trial, suggest that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Miami Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Coquille Mill & Tug Co. v. Robert Dollar Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. County of Lincoln v. FISCHEROregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Rayburn Et Ux. v. Crawford Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Kreinbring v. MathewsOregon Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Franke v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Young v. Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Bross v. PeytonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Pioneer Resources, LLC v. LemargieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Davenport v. GruberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API