Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Oppenheimer Management Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1984No. 80 Civ. 397 (ADS), 82 Civ. 2120 (ADS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SOFAER, District Judge:
Both of the cases before this court concern the legality of a decision by defendant Daily Cash Accumulation Fund, Inc. (“the Fund”), a money-market mutual fund, to adopt a Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1, 17 C.F.R. § 270.12b-l (1984) (“the Plan”). The Plan allows the Fund to reimburse certain securities dealers for administrative and sales-related costs in rendering distribution assistance to the Fund. Plan H 2 (1982 Fund Proxy Statement, Exh. A, at 19 (Mar. 25,1982)). Plaintiff, a stockholder of the Fund, has challenged the legality of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hart Schaffner & Marx v. Alexander's Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meyer v. Oppenheimer Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Kalish v. Franklin Advisers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Meyer for Meyer v. Oppenheimer Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Meyer v. Oppenheimer Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- MEYER FOR MEYER v. Oppenheimer Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.