Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. City of Wichita

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 15, 1995No. 73,038PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.:

The Kansas Workers Compensation Board (Board) found that Dan Armstrong, the claimant, “suffers a condition as a result of his exposure to chemicals at work which has resulted in a disability.” Claimant was determined to be 100 percent temporarily disabled. This decision affirmed an earlier decision in favor of claimant by the administrative law judge (ALJ). The City of Wichita (City) appeals from these decisions in favor of claimant and particularly from the finding that claimant suffered from an occupational disease.

Claimant was employed by the City in its sewer department.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Foulk v. Colonial TerraceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  4. State v. HaddockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Leaf v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. US Sugar Corp. v. HensonSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Banks v. IMC Kalium Carlsbad Potash Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. IsleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API