Legal Opinion

Sowles v. Witters

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont

Decided October 17, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. On motion to remand.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This suit was brought in the court of chancery of the state, was removed into this court on petition of the defendant receiver, and has been heard on motion of the oratrix to remand, because, as said, not arising under the constitution or laws of the United States, and removed out of time. The bill on its face shows the suit to be brought to recover property solely acquired by the removing defendant, as receiver of a national bank, under direction of the comptroller of the currency, by force of. the laws of the United States, and that his defense must rest, if any he has, upon authority given…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Railroad Co. v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Studebaker Corp. of America v. First Nat. Bank of FlorenceDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1926
  2. Hot Springs Independent School Dist. No. 10 v. First Nat. Bank of Hot SpringsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1894
  3. Auburn Sav. Bank v. HayesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API