Legal Opinion

Amber v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

This is a suit in two counts, each involving a separate shipment of a carload of eggs from Seneca, Kansas, to Chicago, Illinois. The case was tried by the court without the aid of a jury, resulting in a judgment in favor of plaintiff on the first count in the sum of $421.25 and on the second count in the sum. of $1005.24, and defendant has appealed.

The cause of action covered by the first count was before this court in the case of Amber v. Payne, 239 S. W. 588, where practically all of the facts involved in that count are stated except some additional facts that will be hereinafter noted. We…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whelan v. ReillySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. McGinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Robertson v. HopeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Gratiot Street Warehouse Co. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Miller v. BrydenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrah Ex Rel. Joseph v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  2. McDermott v. BurpoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Dietz v. Southern Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Ray Realty Co. v. HoltzmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Forkner v. Louisville Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API