Legal Opinion
Harrah Ex Rel. Joseph v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 6, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-1001PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BISSELL, District Judge.
This action was first filed on January 9, 1991 in the Law Division of the New Jersey Superior Court, Middlesex County. The action was filed by plaintiff Joseph Harrah, a professional photographer d/b/a as “Photography by Joseph” in South Plainfield, New Jersey, against Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (“3M”), a corporation organized under the laws of Minnesota. The original complaint sought damages for defendant 3M’s negligence in failing to provide for safe delivery or return of photographs which plaintiff had loaned to defendant for defendant’s use…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Anthony J. Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. Appeal of Anthony J. ChipolliniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- OneBeacon Insurance v. Haas Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Rowe v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- BML Stage Lighting, Inc. v. Mayflower Transit, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Phoenix Assurance Co. v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Banos v. Eckerd Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.