Legal Opinion

Forkner v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 28, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Willis

Reversing.

This is a shipper’s action against a delivering carrier for injuries to live stock transported in interstate commerce. The Missouri Pacific Railroad Company received at Kansas City, Mo., several carloads of cattle consigned to C. T. Forkner at Winchester, Ky. It issued a uniform live stock contract upon each shipment which came into the possession of the consignee. Among the “terms and conditions” of the contract printed on the •back of each copy was clause (c) of section 4, which reads as follows: “Before the live stock is removed from the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Barrett v. Van PeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Louisiana & Western Railroad v. GardinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Davis v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Hoye v. . Pennsylvania R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knight v. Pennsylvania R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Evans v. Atchison, T. &. S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Louis Ilfeld Co. v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API