Legal Opinion

Woodbridge v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1936No. 26133. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover the balance claimed to he due for services rendered and for an accounting. The answer to the complaint contains certain denials and admissions, and, in addition to this, an affirmative defense and two counterclaims are pleaded. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and at the conclusion of the trial, findings of fact were made sustaining the plaintiff’s right to recover. The defendants moved for a new trial, which was granted. Subsequently, the case was again tried, and the court found again as it had upon the first trial. Prom the judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lloyd v. American Can Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Jellum v. Grays Harbor Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Dornberg v. Black Carbon Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API