Legal Opinion
Wolfkill Feed & Fertilizer Corp. v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 26, 2000No. 18937-6-IIIPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
14 P.3d 877 (2000)
103 Wash.App. 836
WOLFKILL FEED AND FERTILIZER CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Respondent,
v.
James MARTIN and Jane Doe Martin, husband and wife; CTM, Inc., a Washington corporation, Appellants.
No. 18937-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.
December 26, 2000.
Robert J. Reynolds, Yakima, for Appellants.
Nicholas L. Wallace, Schultheis & Tabler, Ephrata, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
Mandatory arbitration rules prohibit any reference to the arbitration in any pleading, brief, or other written or oral statement to the court on trial de novo. MAR…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Wilson v. HorsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DominguezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Wolfkill Feed & Fertilizer Corp. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Jones v. Halvorson-BergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Smith v. Behr Process Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Smith v. Behr Process Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Tatham v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Hazen v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- In re the Marriage of MeredithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.