Legal Opinion

W. E. Anderson Sons Co. v. Local Union No. 311

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1952No. 32436Published

1Opinion of the CourtHast, J.

The question presented is whether there was a plan formally or informally adopted and followed in concert by the defendants Pfeiffer, 0 ’Day and the unions in picketing and bannering the construction project and thereby exerting pressure upon members of the several craft unions employed on the construction job to bring about a concerted work stoppage and thus cause Barnes, as the general contractor of such construction, to order his subcontractor Iiolt to cancel the employment of the plaintiff and its men because *548the men were not members of the union, and, if so, whether such concerted plan…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API