W. E. Anderson Sons Co. v. Local Union No. 311
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHast, J.
The question presented is whether there was a plan formally or informally adopted and followed in concert by the defendants Pfeiffer, 0 ’Day and the unions in picketing and bannering the construction project and thereby exerting pressure upon members of the several craft unions employed on the construction job to bring about a concerted work stoppage and thus cause Barnes, as the general contractor of such construction, to order his subcontractor Iiolt to cancel the employment of the plaintiff and its men because *548the men were not members of the union, and, if so, whether such concerted plan…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.