Legal Opinion
Sunshine Insurance Co. v. Sprung
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 1990No. 16674PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
ACTION
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment that no coverage exists for James Sprung (James) under his own automobile insurance policy for liability incurred while using his wife’s automobile. We affirm.
FACTS
James and Audrey Sprung (Audrey) were married on June 6, 1986. Prior to their marriage, James and Audrey each owned their own automobile. Audrey insured her vehicle with State Farm Insurance Company while James insured his vehicle with Sunshine Insurance Company (Sunshine). After their marriage, James added Audrey’s name to his insurance policy. James also instructed Audrey to add…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Butterfield v. Citibank of South Dakota, N.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Nielsen v. McCabeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- McGriff v. United States Fire Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Rapid City Regional Hospital, Inc. v. South Dakota Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. ElliotSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Julson v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Lowery Construction & Concrete, LLC v. Owners Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Barclay v. State Auto Insurance CompaniesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Sheldon v. Hartford InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.