Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2005No. 41967PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Maupin, J.:

In this opinion, we examine the extent to which a defendant in a criminal case is entitled to have the trial jury instructed upon his theory of the case. This examination implicates our recent decision in Crawford v. State 1 and requires us to revisit this court’s decision in Honeycutt v. State. 2

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This case involves the State’s prosecution of appellant Anthony Carter on charges of sexual assault and attempted sexual assault.

The victim alleged that Carter sexually assaulted her at his apartment in Las Vegas, Nevada. Carter, in an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Petrocelli v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Crawford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. United States v. Ralph G. FaganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Crawford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Rose v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Mendoza v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Grey v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API