Mendoza v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Maupin, J.:
In this appeal, we clarify the criteria for dual convictions for kidnapping and robbery when such charges arise from a single course of conduct. We also resolve questions concerning custodial statements to authorities under Miranda v. Arizona, 1 where the accused has not explicitly stated the intent to waive the right to counsel, and the discretion of the district court in limiting cross-examination in criminal cases.
We conclude that the district court adequately instructed the jury with regard to kidnapping charges for which appellant Juan Mendoza stood trial.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Rosky v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State of Iowa v. Scott Robert RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Pascua v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- BELCHER, JR. (NORMAN) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
- State of Tennessee v. Jerome Maurice TeatsTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.