Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 15, 1934No. 3 Div. 105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Section 5191 of the Code of 1923 says: “Any person who treats, or offers to treat diseases of human beings in this state iby any system of treatment, whatsoever, without having obtained a certificate of qualification from the state board of medical examiners, shall be guilty” etc. The treatment, as set out in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, was “massages” by the defendant of two persons, one of whom had a pain in her shoulder and the other a pain in the neck, and, .this being so, the state failed to show that the defendant treated them for a disease.

'We find no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merriam v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Ex Parte WidemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Frazier v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. State Ex Rel. Biggs v. HigbeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bentley v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. People v. ReuterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  3. Ferguson v. State Ex Rel. BaileyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API