Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Wideman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 28, 1925No. 3 Div. 704PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The indictment contained two counts. The trial court overruled the demurrer of defendant to the first count; the Court of Appeals found no error in this ruling. This count alleged: "That the defendant did treat or offer to treat diseases of human beings without having obtained a certificate of qualification from the state board of medical examiners."

It fails to allege by what system of treatment the defendant did treat or offer to treat the diseases. It fails to allege that he did treat or did offer to treat diseases of human beings by a system of treatment. Was one or the other allegation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sparrenberger v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Ex Parte StollenwerckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berk v. State Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Harris v. State Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. White v. State Ex Rel. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Belding v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Cummings v. State Ex Rel. BiggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API