Legal Opinion
Abrams v. Van Schaick
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 19, 1934No. 186PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
The Court of Appeals of the State of New York reversed an order of the Special Term of the Supreme Court which enjoined the Superintendent of Insurance from making any payments for expenditures incurred in connection with plans of reorganization promulgated under Chapter 745 of the Laws of 1933 relating to guaranteed participating certificates sold by the New York Title and Mortgage Company. The motion for injunction, denied by the Court of Appeals, was made in advance of the promulgation of a plan by the Superintendent of Insurance applicable to the interests of the appellants. Whether, if…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of EmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Cincinnati v. VesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Stearns v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
3Cited by31 opinions
- Highland Farms Dairy, Inc. v. AgnewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Coffman v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State v. MarleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- The State of Texas v. Daniel GrundstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Matter of Mtge. Com. (1175 Evergreen Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1936
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.