Legal Opinion

Stearns v. Wood

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1915No. 647PublishedCited by 36 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN. DISTRICT OP OHIO. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this court on a direct appeal from the District Court, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

This is a direct appeal from the District Court which held that the original bill states no cause of action. It must be dismissed unless the case involves the construction. or application of the Constitution of the United States, or the constitutionality of a Federal statute is fairly drawn in question.

The only serious attempt to show'that appellant has a direct personal interest in the subject presented is found in the section of the bill which alleges that he is now serving as a Major in the Inspector General’s Department of the Ohio National Guard and is aggrieved because defendant Wood,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Little v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Richardson v. McChesneySupreme Court of the United States · 1910

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Estado Libre Asociado v. AguayoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
  4. United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien GesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Texas v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API