Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Richard Gill Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1952No. 12465PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

After a trial before the court without a jury, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Richard Gill Company (hereinafter referred to as Gill) and against defendants, Mrs. Max Fischer, Ray F. Fisch er and Frank K. Butcher, for the sum of $1,097.50. Defendants have appealed and plaintiff has filed cross-assignments of error, contending that it was entitled to a recovery of $2,090.

The facts are for the most part undisputed and no findings of fact or conclusions of law were requested or filed. The theory upon which plaintiff was,allowed a recovery was that defendants had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Dale v. SimonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Ward v. ScarboroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Austin v. NeimanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Distributing Corp. v. CockeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Republic National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Tower Contracting Co., Inc. of Tex. v. Burden Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Sage Street Associates v. Northdale Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Matthews v. Matthews, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  5. Austin Paving Co. v. Cimarron Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API