Legal Opinion

Candice Rae Shurden Ballard v. Joe Marshall Ballard

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2017No. 2016–CA–00615–SCTPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. Appellant Candice Ballard and Appellee Joe Marshall Ballard were married in 2006. The parties' marriage was turbulent at best, and they ultimately agreed to an irreconcilable differences divorce with the chancery court to decide issues, among others, of child custody and visitation, equitable division of property, and attorneys' fees. The chancery court entered a final order in the matter in 2016.

¶ 2. The bulk of Candice's appeal revolves around the chancery court's order denying her custody of the parties' three minor children based upon the chancery…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Albright v. AlbrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hemsley v. HemsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Armstrong v. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Sanderson v. SandersonMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Candice Rae Shurden Ballard v. Joe Marshall BallardMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Cincinnatus E. Alford, III v. Linda B. AlfordMississippi Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Cincinnatus E. Alford, III v. Linda B. AlfordMississippi Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Haley Summers v. Patrick Gros and Sherry GrosMississippi Supreme Court · 2021
  5. S.F. v. Lamar County Department of Child Protection Services by Marcus Davenport, L.J.F. and Z.E.F., Minors, by and Through Their Next Friend, Marcus DavenportMississippi Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API