Legal Opinion

Jonas v. Hirshburg

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1897No. 2,207PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Wiley, J. —

Appellee brought this action against appellant to recover damages for alienating his wife’s affections, and for causing her to live apart and separate from him, appellee’s wife being the daughter of appellant. The issues being joined, the cause was tried by a jury, a special verdict returned, and judgment pronounced thereon in favor of appellee. Appellant’s motion for a venire de novo, for judgment on the special verdict, and for a new trial were respectively overruled, and on appeal she has assigned error a-s follows:

First. The court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Central Union Telephone Co. v. FehringIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Puterbaugh v. PuterbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Gregg v. GreggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Farneman v. FarnemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Bence v. DenboIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Sowle v. SowleNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API