Legal Opinion

J. H. Gerlach Co. v. Noyes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action for the alleged conversion of certain bowling alleys. Upon substantially the same evidence, the case was before this court in December, 1921, and is reported in 241 Mass. 69. At the conclusion of the evidence in the second trial, the defendant moved that a verdict be directed in his favor; and he excepted to the denial of the motion and to the refusal to give certain requests for rulings of law. The jury found for the plaintiff.

The facts warranted by the reported evidence are that in the summer of 1915 the defendant was engaged in constructing a building, suitable for use as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. David v. ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Worcester Morris Plan Co. v. MaderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Bryan v. Traders' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Carson v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Medford Trust Co. v. Priggen Steel Garage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Levin v. RoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Zielinski v. Philadelphia Piers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Marsh v. S. M. S. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Gorin v. StroumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API