Legal Opinion
Zielinski v. Philadelphia Piers, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 21, 1956No. Civ. A. 15153PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff requests a ruling that, for the purposes of this case, the motor-driven fork lift operated by Sandy Johnson on February 9, 1953, was owned by defendant and that Sandy Johnson was its agent acting in the course of his employment on that date. The following facts are established by the pleadings, interrogatories, depositions and uncontradicted portions of affidavits:
1. Plaintiff filed his complaint on April 28, 1953, for personal injuries received on February 9, 1953, while working on Pier 96, Philadelphia, for J. A. McCarthy, as a result of a collision of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dictograph Products Company, Inc. v. Sonotone Corporation, Emil Henry Greibach and S. Michael PinelesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Fox v. Capital Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Reifsnyder v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Deakyne v. Commissioners of LewesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic RidesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Robert Ruiz v. Hamburg-American Line, a Corporation, Defendant-Third-Party v. Jones Stevedoring Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- American Color & Chemical Corp. v. Tenneco Polymers, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1995
- Denver v. ForbesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.