Legal Opinion

Moody v. Dorsett

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 29, 2014No. 2D13-1010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Chief Judge.

This case arises out of an automobile accident in which Gregory Dorsett was *1183injured and Mae Rose Moody was determined to be negligent. Following trial, the jury returned a verdict against Ms. Moody in the amount of $11,237.86 for Mr. Dor-sett’s personal injuries. Prior to trial Mr. Dorsett’s insurance carrier paid him $5484.96 in personal injury protection (PIP) coverage proceeds. On appeal, Ms. Moody challenges the trial court’s denial of her request to apply this amount as a setoff to the jury’s verdict. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.

During the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. ARKY, FREED v. Bowmar Instrument Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Caruso v. BaumleSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. Arky, Freed v. Bowmar InstrumentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. ZalayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Wallace v. Allstate Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MARLYN TRACEY v. WELLS FARGO BANK N. A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Gulf Eagle, LLC v. Park East Development, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. GCTC HOLDINGS, LLC v. T TAG QSR, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API