Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Baumle

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 24, 2004No. SC03-127PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

880 So.2d 540 (2004)

Helen M. CARUSO, etc., Petitioner,

v.

Earl BAUMLE, Respondent.

No. SC03-127.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 24, 2004.

D. Paul McCaskill, Orlando, FL, for Petitioner.

Elizabeth C. Wheeler, Orlando, Florida; and Lourdes Calvo-Paquette of the Law Offices of Robert Soifer, Orlando, FL, for Respondent.

Thomas R. Thompson of Thompson, Crawford & Smiley, Tallahassee, FL, for Florida Defense Lawyers Association, Amicus Curiae.

CANTERO, J.

This case involves the introduction in evidence of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits for purposes of a setoff in an automobile accident case. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rollins v. PizzarelliSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Sheffield v. Superior Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. RudnickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. McKenna v. CarlsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Allstate Ins. Co. v. ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—Report No. 09-01Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Norman v. FarrowSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. SheltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Felgenhauer v. BondsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Moody v. DorsettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API