Wallace v. Allstate Indemnity Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Appellant, Catherine Wallace [“Wallace”] appeals the final judgment entered in favor of Appellee, Allstate Indemnity Company [“Allstate”]. Wallace contends that the trial court reversibly erred by setting off PIP benefits after trial. She asks that judgment be entered in the amount of the original verdict.
This appeal arises from a motor vehicle accident involving Wallace and two unknown drivers who fled the scene after the collision. Wallace was insured by Allstate. Wallace filed suit against Allstate seeking uninsured motorist benefits. Allstate admitted that it provided UM coverage to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Caruso v. BaumleSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Caruso v. BaumleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Wendell v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moody v. DorsettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Marie Avril and Clifford RomainDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024