Contractors Ass'n of Eastern Pennsylvania, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
The City of Philadelphia (City) and intervening defendant United Minority Enterprise Associates (UMEA) appeal from the *591district court’s judgment declaring that the City’s set-aside program for black construction contractors, Phila. Code § 17-500 et. seq. (Chapter 17-500 or Ordinance), violates the Equal Protection rights of the Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania (CAEP) and eight other contracting associations (Contractors). We agree with the district court that Chapter 17-500 is not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wygant v. Jackson Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Contractors Ass'n of Eastern Pennsylvania v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Sheet Metal Workers, Local 19 v. 2300 Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Carol Majeske v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Independent Enterprises Inc. Thomas Lozecki v. Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Rothe Development Corporation v. United States Department of Defense and United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- William R. Reynolds, and Harold Dennis, Plaintiff/cross-Appellee v. City of Chicago, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.