Legal Opinion
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Slater
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 25, 2000No. 97-1304PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Following the Supreme Court’s vacation of our dismissal on mootness grounds, we address the merits of this appeal, namely, the federal government’s challenge to the district court’s grant of summary judgment to plaintiff-appellee Adarand Constructors, Inc. In so doing, we must resolve the constitutionality of the use in federal subcontracting procurement of the Subcontractor Compensation Clause (“SCC”), which employs race-conscious presumptions designed to favor minority enterprises and other “disadvantaged business enterprises” (“DBEs”). Our evaluation…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Yu Kikumura v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Rothe Development Corporation v. United States Department of Defense and United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- West Tennessee Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2000
- Builders Association of Greater Chicago v. County of Cook, and Association of Asian Construction Enterprises, Intervening-Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.