Legal Opinion
Bartell v. Riddell
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 5, 1962No. Civ. 1286-61PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THURMOND CLARKE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court for consideration of plaintiff’s application for preliminary injunction and defendants’ motions to dissolve the temporary restraining order issued herein and dismiss the complaint. The court concludes that plaintiff’s application for preliminary injunction should be granted and that defendants’ motions are not well taken and will therefore be denied.
The complaint alleges the following facts which, for the purposes of these proceedings, the court assumes to be true: Several years ago, defendant Rid-dell and the Internal Revenue…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. James R. CosonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Long v. RasmussenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1922
- Wells v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Adler v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Seattle Association of Credit Men, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Fred A. Reece v. W. C. Scoggins, Individually and D/B/A Spkz CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Pargament v. FitzgeraldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Murray v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.