Legal Opinion
Cottongim v. Woods
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 4, 1996No. 9504-64122; CA A88674PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.
Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence underlying a restraining order that his former girlfriend obtained pursuant to ORS 107.700 et seq. We affirm.
The challenged restraining order was issued against appellant on April 13, 1995. He requested a hearing. ORS 107.716(1); ORS 107.718(8). After the hearing was held, the lower court ruled that the restraining order would remain in effect in its entirety, and entered an order so stating on May 2,1995. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on May 24,1995.
The restraining order expired on April 13, 1996. Appellant submitted his brief on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Marriage of Strother v. StrotherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. KeenanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Thompson v. PrinslowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Liberty Television, Inc. v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stupek v. Wyle Laboratories Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Lefebvre v. LefebvreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Fielder v. FielderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Holbert v. NoonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Scott v. Matlack, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.