Legal Opinion
Scott v. Matlack, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 30, 2000No. 97CA1496PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge NEY.
Defendants, Matlack, Inc., and Conoco, Inc., appeal the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, Randy A. Scott (driver) and Ann C. Scott (wife) We reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Plaintiffs operated a trucking company, A & R Trucking, which had no employees. Matlack, a trucking company that hauls bulk commodities, entered into an agreement with plaintiffs which provided that A & R Trucking, as a leased operator, would lease its truck and the services of its driver to Mat-lack. It is undisputed that the lease agreement complies…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Udall v. Colonial Penn InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Willer v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- City of Thornton v. ReplogleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scott v. Matlack, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Vetten v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Alaplex Transp., Inc. v. RossenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- USF Distribution Services, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2004