Legal Opinion
Crespo v. Stapf
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 25, 1992Published
1Opinion of the Court
128 N.J. 351 (1992)
608 A.2d 241
NELSON CRESPO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOSEF STAPF, JOSEF STAPF MASCHINENBAU, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND BETTFEDERENBEAR-BEITUNGSMASCHINEN, SCHACHNE FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER AND DOWN PRODUCTS, INC., PURO DOWN INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PURO INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY CORP., JOHN DOE (FICTITIOUS) AND ABC COMPANY, (FICTITIOUS), DEFENDANTS, AND JACK PIERMONT AND LERNER AND PIERMONT, ESQS., INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 6, 1992.
Decided June 25, 1992.
John C. Kennedy argued the cause for appellant (O'Donnell, Kennedy,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.