Legal Opinion
Office of Consumer Advocate v. Iowa Utilities Board
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 15, 2008No. 06-0541PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Justice.
The Iowa Utilities Board (Board) interpreted Iowa Code section 476.103 (2003) and Iowa Administrative Code rule 199-22.23 (1999) to require the verification of a change in telecommunications service and a verification of the terms and conditions the customer consented to when agreeing to the change. On judicial review, the district court reversed the decision of the Board finding these provisions only required the carrier to obtain the customer’s verification of a change in service, not a verification of the terms and conditions of the change in service. Because we agree with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Auen v. Alcoholic Beverages Division of Iowa Department of CommerceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Carolan v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- American Home Products Corp. v. Iowa State Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Hollinrake v. Iowa Law Enforcement AcademySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- State v. SnyderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tom Brakke and Rhonda Brakke D/B/A/ Pine Ridge Hunting Lodge, and McBra, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Natural Resources and Iowa Natural Resource CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Hawkeye Land Company v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Evercom Systems, Inc. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Iowa Beta Chapter of Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. State, University of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- The Waldinger Corporation, Emcasco Insurance Company, and Second Injury Fund of Iowa v. Michael B. MettlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.