Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Commercial Trust & Savings Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 2, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,786PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Defendant appeals from an adverse decree entered after hearing by the court in a chancery proceeding.

Plaintiff alleged that on April 27, 1926, she was the owner of a promissory note for $13,000 drawing interest at six per cent, secured by a trust deed upon land in McHenry county, Illinois; that she left these papers with John F. Hahn for possible foreclosure; that subsequently, without her knowledge or consent these papers or their equivalent came into the .possession of the defendant bank, which has refused to deliver them to plaintiff. Defendant answering says, among other things, that it…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Higgins v. LansinghIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Neagle v. McMullenIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Booker v. BookerIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Zollman v. Jackson Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Cicero v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  2. State Bank & Trust Co. v. Commercial Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API