Legal Opinion
Edinburg v. Edinburg
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided May 19, 1986PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.
This phase of the Edinburg litigation concerns the ownership of nineteen pieces of art work and a parcel of real estate in Jacksonville, Vermont. The case was heard and decided by a probate judge of the Middlesex Division pursuant to the orders of assignment and consolidation discussed in Pinkowitz v. Edinburg, ante 180 (1986). The judge concluded that Dorothy B. Edinburg had either made gifts of or sold the disputed art works to her children’s trusts and that the Vermont property was owned by the trust for her daughter Hope Edinburg. We affirm the judgment.
The case arose as follows. Dorothy,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In the Matter of Multiponics, Incorporated, Bankrupt. MacHinery Rental, Inc. And Carl Biehl v. William W. Herpel, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Building Inspector of Lancaster v. SandersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- First Pennsylvania Mortgage Trust v. Dorchester Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Hawthorne's, Inc. v. Warrenton Realty, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Rood v. NewbergMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Brandao v. DoCantoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Castricone v. MicalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.