Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Snashall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1927No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteers, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries claimed to have been received in an automobile accident through defendant’s negligence. He had verdict and judgment for $1,755. His injuries were serious, and it is not claimed the amount of the judgment is excessive provided legal liability is shown. Defendant’s assignments of error all center on the one contention that the evidence failed to make out even a prima, facie case of actionable negligence on defendant’s part. This question was saved for review by motion for a directed verdict at close of plaintiff’s testimony, also…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnowsky v. HelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Schoepper v. Hancock Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Burghardt v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Alpern v. ChurchillMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. O'Neill v. JamesMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bolio v. ScholtingNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In Re MathersMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Fish v. Grand Trunk Western RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Eaton v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Soltar v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API