Legal Opinion

Exchange State Bank v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 14, 2008No. 97,452PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

Exchange State Bank of St. Paul, Kansas, bought a “check kiting fraud indemnification policy” from Kansas Bankers Surety Company. Exchange Bank certainly suffered a substantial loss from check-kiting, and it seeks to recover on the policy. We must decide whether its loss was covered under the policy s terms. The policy’s key provisions will focus our consideration.

The first sentence of the policy said that it was “intended to protect the Insured from loss sustained because of the classic check kiting fraud.” In a classic check-kiting scheme, a bank customer uses two or more checking…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lee Builders, Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. City of Arkansas City v. BrutonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Berry F. Laws, Iii, Trustee v. United Missouri Bank of Kansas City, N.A., the Missouri Bankers Association, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. State v. CoyoteSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. SEC. Nat. Bank of Kansas City v. Continental Ins.District Court, D. Kansas · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harding v. Capitol Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024
  2. James Roy Holliday, Jr. v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API