Legal Opinion · Dissent

Darco Transportation v. Dulen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1996No. 84374Published

1Dissent

WATT, J.,

with whom KAUGER, V.C.J., HODGES and SUMMERS, JJ. join, dissenting:

Today’s opinion sustains an award of workers’ compensation benefits to a claimant for injuries sustained while engaging in sexual intercourse. I cannot accede to the majority’s decision. It is my opinion that the claimant’s activities at the time of his accident constituted a form of “horseplay” not covered by the Workers’ Compensation Act. By engaging in sexual intercourse, the claimant transformed his otherwise legitimate work-related conduct into conduct that did not “aris[e] out of ... his employment” within the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Willis v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Oklahoma-Arkansas Tel. Co. v. FriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API