Legal Opinion
State v. Huddleston
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 29, 1980PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Judge.
The defendants, Robert Mark Huddle-ston, Frederick L. Fritz, Darrell R. Wood and Paxson P. Parsons have been indicted for the misdemeanors of operating an adult book store without a license, a violation of 24 Del.C. § 1606(a); 1 the selling of obscene materials in violation of 11 Del.C. § 1361(a)(1); and for possessing obscene materials for purpose of sale, a violation of 11 Del.C. § 1361(a)(4). The defendant Keith Sherlock has been separately indicted for a single violation of operating an adult book store without a license. All have moved to dismiss the licensing violations…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Broadway Books, Inc. v. RobertsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
- Moody v. Board of Shawnee County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Adust Video v. Nueces County, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- California Restaurant Assn. v. HenningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Rush v. ObledoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.