Legal Opinion

California Restaurant Assn. v. Henning

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1985No. A019519PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SABRAW, J.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether Labor Code section 93 is constitutional.

Plaintiff California Restaurant Association is a nonprofit corporation comprised of approximately 2,200 members who own and operate about 8,000 restaurants throughout the state. Defendant Patrick W. Henning (hereinafter referred to as defendant or the Commissioner) is the state Labor Commissioner and chief of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement in the Department of Industrial Relations. (Lab. Code, §§ 21, 56-57, 79.) 1 The Division of Labor Standards Enforcement is…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Bradshaw v. ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. City of S.F. v. Uber Techs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Mautner v. PeraltaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Pinney v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API