Shidy v. Cutter
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, in Equity. The deed referred to in the opinion of the Court from Charles T. Davis to Edwin C. Cutter and James E. Eitch, trustees, recited as follows: “ Whereas the said Charles T. Davis stands justly indebted unto Reverend Joseph W. Parker in the full and just sum of five thousand five hundred dollars, deferred payment of purchase money, for the hereinafter described property, for which amount he hath made and passed…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, in Equity. The deed referred to in the opinion of the Court from Charles T. Davis to Edwin C. Cutter and James E. Eitch, trustees, recited as follows: “ Whereas the said Charles T. Davis stands justly indebted unto Reverend Joseph W. Parker in the full and just sum of five thousand five hundred dollars, deferred payment of purchase money, for the hereinafter described property, for which amount he hath made and passed to the said Reverend Joseph W. Parker his certain promissory note, dated April 27th, A. D. 1876, and payable to the…
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
This appeal is from an order ratifying a sale of certain real estate in Prince George’s County made hy trustees in a deed from Charles T. Davis to them, dated the 21st of June, 1876, and recorded on the 3rd of July, following. It appears that Davis, afterwards, on the 9th of September, 1876, sold and conveyed the same land to the appellant, who purchased without actual, but of course with constructive, notice of the prior deed to these trustees, and exceptions to the ratification of the sale were filed hy him. The only questions raised hy these exceptions that need be noticed are,—
First. That…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stanhope v. DodgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
3Cited by1 opinion
- Epp v. HintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914