Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Frostburg v. Jenkins

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 24, 2001No. [No. 24, September Term, 1957.]Published

1Dissent

Prescott, J.,

filed the following dissenting opinion.

It is regrettable, when one member of the Court is unable to concur with the majority upon such an important and far reaching question as is here involved, that time will not permit a careful and comprehensive statement of the reasons why that member cannot yield his full concurrence. As sufficient time is not available, the following is freely acknowledged to be a hurriedly put together statement of some of those reasons.

The majority opinion holds that under the provisions of section 103 of Chapter 662 of the Acts of 1953, the City of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. State v. Town of North MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. People v. Westchester County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. State Ex Rel. Beck v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API